<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel, Racism Inside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://penciledin.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688</link>
	<description>Poetry and Graphic Design by Benjamin Daniel Lawless</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addendumb</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=2#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Addendumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-346</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pull, tap, link, flex, grip, pump, gush and drip...&lt;/strong&gt;

The new Heineken draughtkeg robot commercial has been eating at me.  Don’t get me wrong…it’s a cool commercial.  The song is catchy, the graphics are slick, and the robot is intriguing.  Even the webs......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pull, tap, link, flex, grip, pump, gush and drip&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The new Heineken draughtkeg robot commercial has been eating at me.  Don’t get me wrong…it’s a cool commercial.  The song is catchy, the graphics are slick, and the robot is intriguing.  Even the webs&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patreisha</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=2#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Patreisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I am African American, and this ad gets on my nerves because everyone assumes, if you are black, that you are just naturally good at sports. No one is just &quot;naturally&quot; good at anything. To be an athlete, no matter what race you are, or doctor or what ever profession, takes so much time, effort and practice. I think may people fail to see the hard that goes into anything. If everyone assumes that we are just good in sports, it leaves room for stereotypes that we are not as good in other areas. Come on people, it isn&#039;t hard to do. Just THINK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am African American, and this ad gets on my nerves because everyone assumes, if you are black, that you are just naturally good at sports. No one is just &#8220;naturally&#8221; good at anything. To be an athlete, no matter what race you are, or doctor or what ever profession, takes so much time, effort and practice. I think may people fail to see the hard that goes into anything. If everyone assumes that we are just good in sports, it leaves room for stereotypes that we are not as good in other areas. Come on people, it isn&#8217;t hard to do. Just THINK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MooMooMan</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=2#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>MooMooMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re overreacting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re overreacting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The-f-word.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple&#8217;s advertising gaffe</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=2#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>The-f-word.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple&#8217;s advertising gaffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-355</guid>
		<description>[...] brief commentary on Apple&#8217;s latest advertising gaffe. The I-Mac blunder comes on the heels of Intel&#8217;s latest faux pas with an advertisement showing dark-skinned athletes &#8220;bowing&#8221; to a white [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brief commentary on Apple&#8217;s latest advertising gaffe. The I-Mac blunder comes on the heels of Intel&#8217;s latest faux pas with an advertisement showing dark-skinned athletes &#8220;bowing&#8221; to a white [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=2#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Yes, this ad is very racist.  Stop and look at the ad, actually LOOK at it, just the picture. Now, what do you see?

I see, not 6 black runners getting ready to run faster than ever, no I see 6 black men bowing to 1 white guy.

Do you see it now?

This is a very racist ad (unintentionally so, but still).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this ad is very racist.  Stop and look at the ad, actually LOOK at it, just the picture. Now, what do you see?</p>
<p>I see, not 6 black runners getting ready to run faster than ever, no I see 6 black men bowing to 1 white guy.</p>
<p>Do you see it now?</p>
<p>This is a very racist ad (unintentionally so, but still).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gurdit</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=2#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Gurdit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-353</guid>
		<description>You could be over-reacting. The ad could be an acknowledgement of the simple fact that Africans run better and faster.

If you hadn&#039;t put up a post about this, had I seen this ad in a newspaper/magazine, I wouldn&#039;t even have paid so much attention to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could be over-reacting. The ad could be an acknowledgement of the simple fact that Africans run better and faster.</p>
<p>If you hadn&#8217;t put up a post about this, had I seen this ad in a newspaper/magazine, I wouldn&#8217;t even have paid so much attention to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=2#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s what they really wanted to do...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/7048/intelsprinterswh4.swf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/7048/intelsprinterswh4.swf&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s what they really wanted to do&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/7048/intelsprinterswh4.swf" rel="nofollow">http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/7048/intelsprinterswh4.swf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric henderson</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=1#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>eric henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-351</guid>
		<description>This event (the ad and these responses) are emblematic of where we are, i.e. still not quite sure how to play in the sand box yet.  Yeah, that&#039;s a bummer here in 2007, but a dispassionate approach might help us unbundle our shorts on this one.

First, demote the importance of intentions.  They don&#039;t matter.  Markets and consumers do.   They say you have offended them.  Period.  Either be &quot;brand&quot; enough to stick to your message or &quot;brand&quot; enough to acknowledge their opinion and engage the discussion.

Next, ask if this type of response could have been predicted with some basic business scans, i.e.  taking what you &quot;mean to say&quot; and testing it.  That&#039;s nowhere near near the pc paranoia referred to in some posts - just simple business thought that takes into account the context in which the ad will be viewed.

So, unless we set out with the original goal of tanking the brand, we don’t all need to jet to  sensitivity training just yet.  An academic approach to simple Cultural Competency (M. Chichester, E. Wilson) would yield tons of case studies and real reasons why you may not want to drop an image like that in the marketplace if you really want to do business, your racism or humanitarian virtue notwithstanding.

Too often we assign our emotions to political factors (especially race) but if we see them as simple environmental and business realities, then we can build them into our thinking.  Mitigating risk by being aware of  potentially negative cultural considerations is a BUSINESS skill as defined by managing any component that can directly affect ROI.

I mean, I wish people’s hearts would change and that that would inspire some basic human awareness of “the other.”  That&#039;s a higher plane of thought,  creativity, and action - one that I strive for. But, in case the hearts of the masses don&#039;t change, I&#039;m all for holistic business thought in the meantime, i.e. thought that doesn&#039;t exclude Cultural Competency.

The difficulty that I think will persist lies in people seeing the utility of cultural solutions in business problems.  It may seem too “touchy feely” or pc to actually ask a member of a particular ethnic group, “What does this say to you?” …until you start losing the touch and feel of MONEY behind that misstep.

The anger on the board should be the first cue that we have better odds on solving the business problems than the whole sandbox thing. But I have hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This event (the ad and these responses) are emblematic of where we are, i.e. still not quite sure how to play in the sand box yet.  Yeah, that&#8217;s a bummer here in 2007, but a dispassionate approach might help us unbundle our shorts on this one.</p>
<p>First, demote the importance of intentions.  They don&#8217;t matter.  Markets and consumers do.   They say you have offended them.  Period.  Either be &#8220;brand&#8221; enough to stick to your message or &#8220;brand&#8221; enough to acknowledge their opinion and engage the discussion.</p>
<p>Next, ask if this type of response could have been predicted with some basic business scans, i.e.  taking what you &#8220;mean to say&#8221; and testing it.  That&#8217;s nowhere near near the pc paranoia referred to in some posts &#8211; just simple business thought that takes into account the context in which the ad will be viewed.</p>
<p>So, unless we set out with the original goal of tanking the brand, we don’t all need to jet to  sensitivity training just yet.  An academic approach to simple Cultural Competency (M. Chichester, E. Wilson) would yield tons of case studies and real reasons why you may not want to drop an image like that in the marketplace if you really want to do business, your racism or humanitarian virtue notwithstanding.</p>
<p>Too often we assign our emotions to political factors (especially race) but if we see them as simple environmental and business realities, then we can build them into our thinking.  Mitigating risk by being aware of  potentially negative cultural considerations is a BUSINESS skill as defined by managing any component that can directly affect ROI.</p>
<p>I mean, I wish people’s hearts would change and that that would inspire some basic human awareness of “the other.”  That&#8217;s a higher plane of thought,  creativity, and action &#8211; one that I strive for. But, in case the hearts of the masses don&#8217;t change, I&#8217;m all for holistic business thought in the meantime, i.e. thought that doesn&#8217;t exclude Cultural Competency.</p>
<p>The difficulty that I think will persist lies in people seeing the utility of cultural solutions in business problems.  It may seem too “touchy feely” or pc to actually ask a member of a particular ethnic group, “What does this say to you?” …until you start losing the touch and feel of MONEY behind that misstep.</p>
<p>The anger on the board should be the first cue that we have better odds on solving the business problems than the whole sandbox thing. But I have hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gee Whiz</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=1#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Gee Whiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Oh, brother! I am so tired of this over-sensitivity that our country has brainwashed us all into. I&#039;m not saying that the good ol&#039; USA isn&#039;t still suffering from racial issues - that&#039;s obvious - but come on, people. Looking for every single hidden racial message you can imagine is not going to help the problem at all. We&#039;re all so quick to pull the racial card; it&#039;s like living through another witch-hunting McCarthy era. If you see &quot;galley slaves&quot; in that ad just by taking a quick glance at it, you&#039;ve got some serious issues. It&#039;s only when some nut with a blog and a little too much free time at his job brings it to light that you all start shouting, &quot;Witch! Witch!&quot;

You know what I see here? I see a multi-billion dollar corporation that&#039;s too cheap to spend some money on a decent ad campaign. This stock-photo-collage-gone-bad is poorly executed and under-thought at best. Even trying to make racial accusations against it gives it a lot more credit and attention than it deserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, brother! I am so tired of this over-sensitivity that our country has brainwashed us all into. I&#8217;m not saying that the good ol&#8217; USA isn&#8217;t still suffering from racial issues &#8211; that&#8217;s obvious &#8211; but come on, people. Looking for every single hidden racial message you can imagine is not going to help the problem at all. We&#8217;re all so quick to pull the racial card; it&#8217;s like living through another witch-hunting McCarthy era. If you see &#8220;galley slaves&#8221; in that ad just by taking a quick glance at it, you&#8217;ve got some serious issues. It&#8217;s only when some nut with a blog and a little too much free time at his job brings it to light that you all start shouting, &#8220;Witch! Witch!&#8221;</p>
<p>You know what I see here? I see a multi-billion dollar corporation that&#8217;s too cheap to spend some money on a decent ad campaign. This stock-photo-collage-gone-bad is poorly executed and under-thought at best. Even trying to make racial accusations against it gives it a lot more credit and attention than it deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688&#038;cpage=1#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penciledin.com/wp/?p=688#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Someone stop thos coons! They&#039;re stealing all the computers!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone stop thos coons! They&#8217;re stealing all the computers!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
